| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lemme guess, you are one of the GSF Survey bitches aren't you?
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.19 17:25:00
|
2. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: You're the one asking CCP to fix that, I never said that it shouldn't take an army, you're attempting to put words in my mouth. I am simply pointing out that it wouldn't be nearly s...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.18 23:49:00
|
3. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Alara IonStorm wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: Ease of logistics and power projection dooms that to fail before it has even begun unless the attackers could rally 1000's of people. Are you saying to take on the largest Empires...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.18 23:39:00
|
4. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
RubyPorto wrote: DarthNefarius wrote: OK since we're playing ThunderdomeGäó So, since you don't seem to like the idea of the Nullsec empires blowing up trillions of ISK for poops and giggles, why are you complaining about it on the forums...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.18 22:11:00
|
5. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: DarthNefarius wrote: what 2-4 years from now ? Whenever its done. Ship balance is more important than moon goo. Well if moon goo isn't important, why doesn't CCP just shut it off?
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 20:34:00
|
6. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia, you can say what you want, but after this post, I'll not be addressing you again. You're a liar and little more, you've chosen to not refute the proof in this very thread. Besides, if those who say that they are all for the nerf/removal ...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 20:10:00
|
7. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: 100% passive, once you set up the tower, it is all ISK printing from there. Manufacturing and PI are both very passive as well. What about those? PI sure could use a rework though I do...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:49:00
|
8. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: I call bullshit. You don't want **** changed, if you did you'd do something about it like shooting monuments in Jita until CCP changed it. We have been calling for a moon nerf for y...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:46:00
|
9. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: ever notice that whenever pubbies complain about technetium, they suddenly get very tight-lipped if not defensive when we bring up the zero-risk, zero-effort, zero-cost isk faucets that are incursions and l4s TBH, I'd like to s...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:44:00
|
10. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Andski wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: I know, they say they do want it fixed, but I don't see them packing up all of their moon harvesters and ceasing production, d...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:36:00
|
11. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: What exactly are they doing? See OP. Quote: I don't see the forums flooded with "CHANGE MOON GOO NAO!!!!!!", "**** MOON GOO" or any other threads similar to what happened with Incarna a...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:30:00
|
12. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: I call bullshit. You don't want **** changed, if you did you'd do something about it like GǪconsistently badgering CCP about how it's broken and then put on a freeze on the activities tha...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:21:00
|
13. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Shooting monuments and unsubbing seemed to work in the past. Besides that, there doesn't need to be a replacement for them to turn off the moons. There's more than likely enough T2 Materials stockpiled to hold the industry over until they can see...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:18:00
|
14. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mallak Azaria wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: I know, they say they do want it fixed, but I don't see them packing up all of their moon harvesters and ceasing production, do you? Because like pre-nerf highsec incursions & ...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 19:04:00
|
15. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: Azami Nevinyrall wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: So you're saying that I don't want moon goo fixed? Hell, I'd probably log in immediately and reactivate the inact...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 18:00:00
|
16. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: So you're saying that I don't want moon goo fixed? Hell, I'd probably log in immediately and reactivate the inactive accounts I have if I were shown proof that moon goo had been sh...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 17:50:00
|
17. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So you're saying that I don't want moon goo fixed? Hell, I'd probably log in immediately and reactivate the inactive accounts I have if I were shown proof that moon goo had been shut off completely. Those who have it want to keep it, most of thos...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 17:36:00
|
18. And you though HI was too safe???? Welcome to ThunderdomeGäó - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DarthNefarius wrote: Gotta like how the spacerich NULLbears try to paint SOV as too tuff while amassing TECH fortunes that'll last for years.... Every future expansion that doesn't address the moon goo bottle neck that lead to this Thunderdome...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.03.16 17:14:00
|
19. Smaller Alliances/Corps Need To Take Their Game Back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kamden Line wrote: Goddamned American Capitalist wrote: Bane Necran wrote: When small groups band together they become the next BoB or NC. What we need is for 0.0 to not just accommodate the very largest groups, but also smaller alliance...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.01.21 02:30:00
|
20. Smaller Alliances/Corps Need To Take Their Game Back - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am not saying that the small handful haven't acquired a vast number of so-called allies and corpmates to do their bidding for them. I'd assume that the vast majority of Goonwaffe are in the same boat as the vast majority of the 26k blues, which...
- by Goddamned American Capitalist - at 2013.01.20 04:26:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |